Central Asia Wire
Independent Central Asia Monitor
Breaking
EcoIslamicBank goes on the EU list from 13 AugustTashkent sends a 300-strong business delegation to KabulKazakhstan moves from a fine to a seizure at KashaganThe war reaches the Caspian
Opinion

Who gains from the UN's silence on Tajikistan

On 3 July the UN Human Rights Council closed a confidential complaint against Tajikistan without a word of explanation. Three days earlier the World Bank had approved another $400 million for the country. Read those two facts together, and the silence has an address.

Who gains from the UN's silence on Tajikistan

The council acted under its 1503 procedure, the confidential track meant for the gravest patterns of abuse. No public hearing, no published finding, and the victims never in the room. The council president said Dushanbe had offered measures and commitments, and did not say what they were. A secret complaint met a secret answer, and the file shut.

Set that beside the ledger. On 30 June the World Bank approved a second $300 million grant for the Rogun dam, and on 1 July another $100 million for reforms. The Asian Development Bank has pledged up to $1.1 billion over two years. Western capitals want Emomali Rahmon steady on the Afghan border. In the same days, the case that named his government's conduct disappeared.

So ask who was paid, because several parties were. Rahmon banks a clean international file at the moment he most needs one. His son Rustam Emomali, mayor of Dushanbe and speaker of the upper house, is the constitutional first in line, and the family holds lifetime immunity written into the constitution. A dynastic handover reads better without an open UN case attached to it.

A dynastic handover reads better without an open UN case attached to it.

The lenders were paid in convenience. A live rights finding complicates a board vote, and a closed one does not. The banks keep their stable borrower and their frontier partner, and they book the reforms Dushanbe promised behind the same shut door where it promised everything else.

The talking shops run beside the money. The European Union holds a yearly human rights dialogue with Dushanbe, and it met in the capital in December 2022, as the Supreme Court handed down those sentences. A dialogue that continues through the verdicts gives Dushanbe cover and costs Brussels nothing.

Moscow and Beijing take the quietest dividend. Each complaint that dies in confidence, with civil society locked out, confirms the rule they preach, that sovereignty outranks scrutiny and states answer only to states. Tajikistan hosts a Russian base and runs on Chinese credit, and both patrons prefer their partner's troubles handled in the dark.

The bill lands on the people who were never at the table. In 2022 security forces crushed protests in Gorno-Badakhshan that the government called a terrorist plot. The official death toll was 21, and unofficial counts ran to twice that. Pamir Daily later documented 205 convictions, 11 of them life terms.

The journalist Ulfatkhonim Mamadshoeva drew 21 years, the lawyer Faromuz Irgashov 30, in trials held behind closed doors. The Islamic Renaissance Party, once the region's only legal religious party, was branded extremist in 2015 and its leaders jailed. Critics who fled to Russia were shipped home to face the same courts.

None of that is hidden. The UN's own rapporteurs recorded it, Human Rights Watch recorded it, the court files hold it. The 1503 complaint closed with the evidence in plain view. It closed because closing it suited everyone whose name was not inside it.

The system worked as its members wanted. Dushanbe traded unpublished promises for a clean page. The banks bought stability with their silence. The patrons paid nothing at all. Everyone at the table came out ahead, and the people who marched in Khorog covered the cost. That is who the silence is for.

Aigerim Bekova writes on the political economy of Central Asia for Central Asia Wire. The views expressed are her own.